Review
This Hands on Review will go over everything you need to know about the New Sony Nex-F3!! Some of the topics covered in this Hands on Review include: Image Quality, Video Quality, Build Quality, Ergonomics, Value for the Dollar, the New Flip screen, and more!! If this sounds intriguing to you, please read on and you won’t be disappointed!!
I had the pleasure to use the Sony Nex-F3 extensively for about one month along side the incredible Sony RX100, which I just finished reviewing and can be checked out Click Here >> if your interested. What was great about having both cameras at the same time is the advantages that each camera had over one another become very clear!! The Nex-F3 has the ability to use multiple lenses which makes it much more powerful right off the bat. Next we have a much larger APS-C sized sensor on the Nex-F3 which allows for better depth of field control and separation between subjects and backgrounds. The Sony RX100 however, offers no burden of carrying at all, because it literally fits in your pocket!! Both cameras take a great photo, but the RX100 is still a point and shoot in the end and should be thought of as such. The Nex camera system however, is much closer to DSLR quality in a much smaller package.
We went to the local fair the other day and I had both the Nex-F3 and the RX100 with me the whole time. I found myself using both cameras depending on the scene, but I was using the Rokinon 8mm fisheye on the Nex-F3, which is limiting for sure. An interesting note about carrying both these cameras was they were still lighter and easier to manage than a DSLR with a decent size lens.
Lenses and Accessories Used
The lenses used for this review include the Sony 18-55mm kit lens (SEL1855), the New Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS Zoom Lens (SEL18200LE), the Nanoha Macro Lens 5:1 from Yasuhara and the New Rokinon 8mm f/2.8 UMC Fisheye Lens. I could have also used my Canon lenses with the Fotodiox lens adapter, but I just didn’t have the time due to all the gear in my hands for the months reviews!!
The accessories used for this Hands on Review were the Sony ECM-SST1 Compact Stereo Microphone, and the Sony FDA-EV1S OLED Electronic Viewfinder. I’ll show you pics and video of all this stuff, so don’t worry
Sony Nex-F3 – Build Quality and Overall Design
In this photo below I had the OLED Viewfinder attached and I must say after using it, I did not want to take it off the camera!!
Be sure to Click on the photos for the large 1200px gallery style version!!
The skin of the Nex-F3 is a smooth plastic that has a very slight texture to it, and the grip is now very similar to the Nex-5n which is a huge improvement. It doesn’t feel as rigid in my hands as the Nex-5n though, because the plastic actually flexes a tiny bit. It’s noticeable when you grab the screen on one corner for example. The E-Mount lens mount area is still rock solid, but the slight screen flex leaves room to desire the Nex 5 and 7 series models. Understandable Sony had to cut costs somewhere, and this new 3-series model has a ton more features than the previous version at the same price point of ~$598 US w/ the 18-55mm kit lens. The Nex-5n is ~$698 and you do gain the better build quality, 1080/60p video, and a few other things, but you lose the built in flash, a ton of new software features, and the flip-up screen design. It’s honestly a tough call if I had to pick between these two cameras with the $100 dollar price difference factored in.
The Nex-F3 chassis has been completely re-designed to accommodate for the new linkage needed to flip the screen 180 degrees upward and 45 degrees downward. The two main mount points of the LCD screen are connected to retractable arms which allows it to rotate 180 degrees. This extra hardware also created the need for a slightly taller camera design. The extra height made for some room for a built in flash that is very similar to the Nex-7 design. The flash also works with the OLED Viewfinder and ECM-SST1 Mic attached to the powered auxiliary port, as it’s offset to the the right looking from the back.
The Flip Screen is particularly useful for doing reviews , as it caters to self portraits or self recordings. Using this camera for reviewing equipment would be great, I could actually see what I’m doing and make sure the Autofocus is on what I want etc..
The flip screen does still aim down a little bit as well, but not near as much as it use to. You can still use it for overhead shooting, but it’s not as visible and is more likely to glare. In my opinion it’s worth losing the better overhead shooting for the advantage of self recording.
HD Video of all the Gear
Check out this Quick HD Video for a 360 degree look at the Sony Nex-F3, lenses, and Accessories used for this review!!
Be sure to select the HD option in the player settings!!
Nex-F3 Vs Nex-C3 – Bottom of the Camera
The Nex-F3 has significantly more surface area on the bottom of the camera and Sony took advantage of this by beefing up the tri-pod mount area. This extra space in the middle was created by making the camera thicker for better sensor cooling and overall strength. You will need to remove your tri-pod /quick re-lease plate in order to change the memory card though, but the battery shouldn’t be an issue for most common plates.
The battery is now facing perpendicular to the camera body which allows for a much deeper grip than the Nex-C3. This makes it easier to hold by simply giving you more leverage. The very bottom of the screen also clicks into the chassis near the tri-pod mount point when in the fully closed position. See below for a closer look, and be sure to check out the HD Video for a detailed 360 degree view!!
![]() |
The newly designed shutter button area is also much better in my opinion. The power switch is now on its own, separated from shutter button and on top of the camera with the record button just behind it. Note how the record button has a protective ring around it to prevent accidental pressing. It’s a nice touch, but is to hard to press for my somewhat large fingers. I have to make a conscious effort to use my pointer finger instead of my fat thumb. This is a bit annoying at first, but I did get used to it after a few uses of the record button.
These little ergonomic improvements do make a difference, especially when using larger lenses like the New Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS Lens as seen below.
A few Sample Photos and Image Quality
Here’s a few snapshots using the Sony Nex-F3 and the 18-55mm kit lens in full Auto Mode and exported from Lightroom 4 at 1200px 65% Quality for fast viewing.
Be sure to Click on the photos for the large 1200px gallery style version!!
As you can see from these sample snapshots, the Nex-F3 and kit lens combo are sharp, and can easily get you nice separation from backgrounds depending on your needs. The bokeh is also not bad for such an affordable lens with optical steady shot and near silent focusing built in. The color and contrast are also really good in my opinion.
The Sony Nex E-mount Lens line is growing slowly but surely!! So, when you get a spare minute be sure to check out my Sony E-Mount Lens Guide >>, where all the available E-Mount lenses are located with direct links to my reviews, and best prices on the web!!
Nex-F3 – AF Performance
The AF is significantly faster and more accurate on the Nex-F3 than the older Nex-C3 in my opinion. I took a lot of test photos and the Nex-F3 was able to track a flying crop duster, moving dogs, and more without much issue. It seems to know where to start focusing better, which makes it faster overall at finding the target. I also found it much easier to track things using the viewfinder rather than the LCD screen as the glare on the screen is brutal in the daylight and you need to use your hand and/or body to help shade it sometimes. At dusk or dawn it’s totally usable though, and of course inside it works great. Really just broad daylight is tuff.
Continuous Shooting at 5.5 fps with focus tracking
The Sony Nex-F3 is able to continuously rapid fire at 5.5 frames per second in high speed priority mode. A respectable speed for even a DSLR, and it can track objects as long as it’s not moving to fast away or towards the camera. Check out this crop duster series below taken with the Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS Lens.
The Plane was panning back and forth in front of me and it was mid morning light which made it really difficult to use the screen. I was hand holding the camera as well, so when zoomed in at 200mm trying to track a plane with a screen in the daylight is close to impossible!! I happen to have the OLED Viewfinder accessory handy though, so I plugged it into the powered auxiliary port and WOW is it awesome!! Now I can see in the daylight and easily track the plane back and fourth!!
Check out a few of these Crop Duster photos and also keep in mind I was using the New Sony 18-200mm OSS Lens @ 200mm wide open @ f/6.3!!
Be sure to Click on the Next Page Buttons Below!!






























great review, thanks!
what bothers me a bit is the frequency sony releases these cameras at… like they’re mobile phones O_O we’re seeing at least one new nex every half year. on the other hand, this certainly is not bad for the customer, as there is more choice…
Thanks for the comments and kind words!! I understand what you mean about the frequency, and I agree that it seems to fast. I would rather get a firmware re-lease each 6 months and one next generation camera per year or so. Seems like the Nex-5n is far from obsolete, but I think Sony is try to attack as many new consumers as possible. More cameras, more features, more sales?? The Pro gear seems to have a much longer re-lease time. The A99 has been coming for years now it seems like!!
Best,
Jay
hai Jay i want to ask, can i use Sony OLED Electronic Viewfinder for NEX-5N to NEX C3 ?
Hey Henry.
The electronic viewfinder does not work on the Nex-C3 as it doesn’t support the power draw, but it does work on the New Nex-F3 etc..
Best,
Jay
thank u Jay for your information
Anytime Henry!!
Jay
Hi,
I own a Nex 5n and F3, you seem to give the F3 a fairly good review, I agree with most of what you wrote, I am puzzled you only give it 3.5 stars compared to 4.5 for Nex 6. If the latter receives 4.5 star to be consistent I would give F3 at least 4 stars.
I like to suggest you derive a point system for your review on each aspect of the camera, e.g. features, images, handling, etc., this will enable you give the reader a more consistent review when compared other other models.
Hello Ttan,
You raise a very valid point here and perhaps I will add a few categories to the reviewing system for the reasons you mentioned. My website template only has the 5 star set-up though unfortunately. I can certainly expand on that though.
I still stand behind the 3.5 score for the Nex-F3, and I’m sorry we don’t agree.
Thanks again for the suggestion and comments,
Jay
Hi,
Other than DPreview.com, the other 2 sites which give me fairly accurate ratings on cameras are:
http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/
The DPreview and last review websites the reviews are based on category, this will give a better reflection of what camera is suitable/capable/ etc for. If you have more time and resources you should also look at DC resources, their review of F3 is very accurate and more importantly thorough.
For the F3, comparing its price with Nex 6, it deserves a 4 star ratings.
Ttan,
I appreciated your previous comments and replied back as such saying, “I’m sorry we don’t agree”.
Now your trying to insult my so-called credibility as a reviewer, because I don’t agree with the mainstream review sites? Seriously? Come on man, really?
Jay
Seriously? You’re trolling for the NEX-F3? I’d only give it a 2 or 2.5 — reviews are all subjective. You’re after objective data, go check out DXOmark and make your own assumptions from that. Or buy one yourself and use it for a while to get a 100% tailor-made review you can trust. If you want to complain about shoddy reviews, go check out Kai at DigitalREV. He’s truly atrocious.
I am not questioning you judgement or your reviews as I have said before. You can give any number of stars you want and in order to be LESS subjective and MORE objective and thereby better consistencies over all your cameras you reviewed. According to me the sites I mentioned I believe their reviews are quite consistent right across the cameras they reviewed.
My point is if you use a well thought out point system based on categories, you should be able come up with a more consistent rating for each camera you reviewed. That way you won’t have too many disputes, arguments and disagreements.
Great website and review!
I own a F3 and have been very pleased with it. I do have a question as far as compatible lenses. I mainly purchased this camera to take pictures of my newborn, who should be arriving any day now. Along with the 18-55mm kit lens my camera came with, do you recommend any other e_mount (or even a-mount, ive considered purchasing the la-ea1 adapter) lenses to take pictures of my new baby girl?
Hello Daniel,
For newborn portraits I would Highly recommend the 50mm f/1.8 OSS Lens, because your going to need to be a bit closer than a standard portrait. It has optical Steady Shot which is great for getting sharp shots in low light and while hand holding at slower shutter speeds. It also has a really fast f/1.8 aperture which is excellent for getting that separation between your model Newborn and the background.
Here is my review if you want to see some sample pics ect.. Sony E-Mount 50mm f/1.8 OSS Lens Review >>
I hope that helps,
Jay