Review
In this hands on review I will cover the VCL-ECF1 E-Mount 15mm Fisheye Conversion Lens and VCL-ECU1 18mm Wide Angle Conversion lenses which attach to the 16mm E-Mount lens. The Sony 16mm lens for the Nex camera line-up is a pretty solid lens for the price. It clearly has flaws such as the corner softness, chromatic aberration issues, and overall sharpness. However, you need to keep in mind that the lens only costs $249.99 US which compared to Zeiss glass or Canon L glass it’s ruffly 1/4 the price!! It’s also 1/4 the size in most cases. The small size of the “pancake” lens in combination with an 18mm flange to sensor distance creates some serious engineering optical challenges as well.
With that in mind, the flaws inherent in the 16mm E-mount lens are going to be present in the conversion lenses as well, because they simple mount on top. Check it out attached to the Nex-C3. It simple screws on just like the regular E-mount only a bit smoother and easier.
As always, be sure to Click the photos for a nice large 1200px version!!
What lens flaws are we talking about you might wonder?? The corners are a bit soft and also suffer from chromatic aberrations, especially in high contrast areas like a sky and tree branches for ex. Even with these weaknesses the 16mm f/2.8 till performs really well on the Nex-5n and Nex-C3 in particular. On the Nex-7 the 16mm does not hold up as good due to the super high res sensor.
Be sure to check out my full review of the 16mm f/2.8 E-Mount Lens for all the details and tons of sample images! (Click Here)
Conversion Lens Product Photos:
The Sony 16mm conversion lenses come in a nice hardened case that can certainly take a drop if you ask me.
Here’s the case opened up resembling a hamburger bun no question! The case has a soft fuzz type fabric inside that doesn’t come off on the lenses.
Here’s both of the Conversion lenses side by side. Fisheye (VCL-ECF1) on the left and the wide angle (VCL-ECU1) on the right.
In this angle below you can see closely the little switch you need to slide downward in order to release the conversion lens from the 16mm lens.
Here’s the Nex-C3 with the Wide Angle conversion lens mounted and the fisheye to the left.
And here’s the Sony Nex-C3 and the Fisheye conversion lens mounted on the 16mm lens and Gorillapod. I was taking some test pics using the Nex-5n and my Canon 135 f/2 lens, but it makes for a nice product shot of the conversion lens in action. Also, check out my Hands On Gorillapod Review Here >> if it peaks your interest!
As you can see from the images above, the conversion lenses double the size of the Sony 16mm pancake lens, but in the process transforms it into another lens. So if size is critical, you may not want these, but the lens selection is so limited for the Nex System I would still have these in my bag for sure.
Next were going to go over some Real World Sample photos using these lenses so you can see what they actually do. The “Lab” pics will come after the real world shots, so you can skip ahead if you like to see those.
HD Video:
Check out this video below of me mounting each conversion lens on the 16mm lens while recording at the same time so you can see the effect each lens has live, so to speak. Make sure you select the 720p HD Video option for the most crisp video.
Real World Sample Photos
This first sample pic I just took on Sunday at the Hurleyville Firehouse pancake dinner with the family. It was fantastic btw and I ate like a pig
Needles to say I got to take some firetruck pics using the Fisheye conversion lens and the Nex-5n for a camera body. I also used a tripod and went for a full blow HDR using multiple exposure’s and shooting RAW. Here is the fully edited HDR photo. Don’t worry, I have a ton of un-edited sample pics coming next, but this pic is cool and I want you to see what can be done with this camera/ lens combo if you do a little post processing!!
Be sure to click the images for a nice large 1200px version!!
Here’s one of those old Historic site signs that are made of Cast Iron. They have a lot of fine details at 100% view and the background is visually far which creates a bokeh in the process.
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and fisheye conversSony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and fisheye conversion lens @ f/8, 1/800sec, ISO 200, 1/60sec, ISO 200, Raw, handheldion lens @ f/8, 1/800sec, ISO 200, 1/60sec, ISO 200, Raw, handheld
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and fisheye conversion lens @ f/8, 1/800sec, ISO 200, 1/60sec, ISO 200, Raw, handheld
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and fisheye conversion lens @ f/8, 1/800sec, ISO 200, 1/60sec, ISO 200, Raw, handheld
Same shot as above, but with the 18mm wide angle conversion lens. I was also bit further away from the sign.
Here is the Historic House that accompanies the Historic Sign shot with the Fisheye lens.
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and fisheye conversion lens @ f/8, 1/640sec, ISO 200, 1/60sec, ISO 200, Raw, handheld
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and fisheye conversion lens @ f/8, 1/640sec, ISO 200, 1/60sec, ISO 200, Raw, handheld
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and fisheye conversion lens @ f/8, 1/640sec, ISO 200, 1/60sec, ISO 200, Raw, handheld
Here’s the same shot with the 18mm Wideangle Conversion Lens.
This next image is a retired Blue Angles jet located at the local park just down the rd. I love to photograph it, and it makes for a great test subject with the paint, chrome, and rust!
Here’s a Snapshot of Layla on the deck in really tuff shooting conditions in Jpeg mode. Chubs was running around, Layla never stops moving, and the Sun was in the cameras face!
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and fisheye conversion lens @ f/4.5, 1/60sec, ISO 100, handheld – Center 100% Crop
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and fisheye conversion lens @ f/4.5, 1/60sec, ISO 100, handheld – Top Left Corner Crop
I took this next shot of Sandy with the 18mm Wideangle Conversion lens mounted and was shooting Raw. It was really bright sun, but I had it to my back this time which made for a decent photo.
As always, be sure to Click the photos for a nice large 1200px version!!
In this next shot of Sadie I managed to get some nice lens flare action while shooting with the wide angle conversion lens and the sun at the edge of the frame.
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and Wideangle Conversion lens @ f/8 1/640sec, ISO 200 – Top Right 100% Crop
These next photos are from the Basha Kill Wildlife preserve and the sky was awesome!! I used the 18mm wide angle conversion lens for these photos and shot in AutoHDR mode 6ev, as the dynamic range was very high shooting into the Sun!! I was also hand holding and the camera did a good job with the alignment and blending if you ask me, but more importantly the wide angle performance speaks fore itself!!
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and Wideangle Conversion lens @ f/8, 1/400sec, ISO 200, AutoHDR, Jpg Handheld
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and Wideangle Conversion lens @ f/8, 1/400sec, ISO 200, AutoHDR, Jpg Handheld
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and Wideangle Conversion lens @ f/8, 1/400sec, ISO 200, AutoHDR, Jpg Handheld – Bottom Left
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and Wideangle Conversion lens @ f/8, 1/400sec, ISO 200, AutoHDR, Jpg Handheld
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and Wideangle Conversion lens @ f/8, 1/400sec, ISO 200, AutoHDR, Jpg Handheld
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and Wideangle Conversion lens @ f/8, 1/400sec, ISO 200, AutoHDR, Jpg Handheld
I purposely took this photo a bit higher to include the phone cable line in the top right corner of the frame. It makes for a nice high contrast edge that is certain to test the optics out!!
This 100% Crop version has the Lens Correction Profile enable in Lightroom 3, and it does a pretty good job with the distortion and chromatic aberrations.
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and Wideangle Conversion lens @ f/9, 1/800sec, ISO 200, Raw, Handheld – Lens Correction
Here’s what it looks like in Lightroom when you enable the feature. Lightroom only supports a few Sony lenses unfortunately, but the 16mm is one of them it does!!
I had to break out the Tri-pod for this next image, but it was totally worth it!! Our friends were having a killer campfire and it was even bigger than I was hoping for
I had to use manual mode for this as the camera struggled with a “correct” exposure. That’s Gary on the left stoking the fire for me and he is blurry do to the 2 second exposure. I used the fisheye conversion lens for this image.
Be sure to Click the photos for a nice large crisp 1200px version!!
In my opinion these real world images should give you a good sense of what this lens actually does in practice. I shot a variety of subjects using a variety of aperture’s and overall both conversion lenses do a very god job. The corners are noticeable weak when it comes to sharpness, vignette, and chromatic aberrations, but it’s really only critically noticeable at 100% and on the very corners. This can easily be cropped out in most cases and if your a pixel peeper like me, you can correct the flaws in post processing. You cannot fix the corner softness to much in post, but you really don’t notice it that much unless your looking for it when it comes to the real world.
Sony Nex-5n w/ 16mm lens and Wideangle Conversion lens @ f/2.8, Raw – Lens Test Shot[/caption]
Top Left Corner 100% Crop
Center 100% Crop
And the Fisheye Conversion lens at f/2.8, f/4. f/8, and f/11.
Keep in mind that the viewing angle of the Fisheye is so great that the depth of field actually plays a roll in the edge and corner sharpness as well as the lens optics itself. So they may appear less harp than you would expect due to the limited depth of field.
Top Left Corner 100% Crop
Center 100% Crop
Conclusion and Closing Remarks:
Both the VCL-ECF1 Fisheye and VCL-ECU1 Wideangle Conversion Lenses do a good job in my opinion and basically just amplify what the 16mm has to offer. Arguable not the greatest lens for the corner sharpness in particular, and you can see that clearly in the test shots. You can also see that the sharpness really pics up at f/4 compared to f/2.8 and then it actually starts to fall off a bit at f/11 in the center most likely due to diffraction. The f/11 does help the depth of field in the fisheye shots though when it comes to corner sharpness.
However, in the real world photos the flaws tends to not matter that much in my opinion. Even on prints your probably won’t notice the corner sharpness issue unless you really look close. Mind you, if your Architecture Photographer and you want the best quality possible, these are Not for you.
If your like me and you just want good quality equipment for a fair price then these conversion lenses are a great option at ~$110 US each. Comparing these lenses to Pro grade glass is just not fair in my opinion, but you can certinaly do that if you want
Value for dollar these lenses are unbeatable if you already have the 16mm E-Mount Lens.
Please feel free to ask any questions below, and have a great day!
Jay
Your support is greatly appreciated as we run this site in our spare time and are not paid. We can however, make a small commission if you click a product link that your interested in. That click will then give us credit if you choose to purchase any given item. This has no effect on the cost of the product, and is a simple way to give back to SonyAlphaLab.com for the effort and info we provide.
Also, be sure to keep following us on Google+, Twitter, RSS-feed, or Sign up for Email Updates!!
Direct Shopping Links – Thanks for your Support!!
BHPhotoVideo | Amazon – US, CA, UK | Adorama | Ebay – US, CA, UK, DE, FR, ES
Thanks,
Jay


























































Nice review and thanks. Looks like a neat combo and quality is high enough mark for me.
One question though… I’m confused why corner sample was provide of the dog close up but not included for the landscape shot where it really counts.
Fine review and I will definitely look for more from you.
Yes I just checked through the gallery again and there doesn’t seem to be any 100% corner samples for infinity focus on any of the combos. All corner samples shown are either foreground branches or OOF from close focus range.
Do you have any infinity corner samples to share with us at 100%?
Thanks!
Hey Clyde,
Thanks for the comments, and sorry about that. It wasn’t on purpose as I figured the test shots were better for the corners, but I will add some for you no problem. You want the landscape AutoHDR photos corners??
Best,
Jay
Ok Clyde, I added a few more photos and added a bunch more corners samples to the Landscape infinity focus shots
Best,
Jay
Can you comment on the ability to add filters to the adapters?
Hi Jacob and thanks for the question! As far as I can tell there is no way to add a filter to the conversion lens unless it’s a socl style filter or something. Their are no threads on the front of the adapters for additional screw on filters.
Best,
Jay
Thank you for you response, that’s a shame. I did find a possible solution here but that seems really involved and probably expensive.
Jacob,
That link didn’t work the first time I tried it, but it’s working now
That solution will definitely work!! I have a set of Cokin filters and they work really good. I think your going to get some serious cropping issues with the fisheye lens converter though.
Jay
Good day to this awesome site. Ive been browsing JHPvideotutorials and Sony Alphalab for quite some time now. Very very good stuff and really great to learn tons. I’m very interested in your articles about the Nex products. There are a lot of similar third party products for the Nex system out there and as a consumer, it is very hard to choose among them. It would really be of great help if you come up with lists and reviews of your recommended third-party Nex accessories such as tripods, battery Grips, L-plates, Lens adapters, Flash syncers, hot-shoe adapters, camera slings and bags, etc. I understand that this takes some time but I’m willing to wait.
More power to JHP and SAL.
John,
Thanks a lot for your sediments about the sites, I really appreciate it
I also can’t blame you for your interest in the Sony Nex products as they are nothing short of incredible value for the dollar, and a blast to use!!
As it pertains to the Nex Accessories, third party items, and the like, I totally agree!! I’ve had the idea to integrate all of that stuff for some time, but as you stated it’s obviously time consuming.
That being said, I do have a decent start to a Sony Accessory Guide going (click Here)
I’m adding items as fast as I can do the re-search, but your feedback on specific stuff is always appreciated so I don’t waste time on items nobody cares about etc..
I added a new Menu tab for the Accessory Guide on top of the website just below the SAL logo. Again it’s a decent start but still needs a lot of work.
I also have the E-Mount lens Guide (Click Here) which breaks down each lens really quick and then provides all the essential links to reviews, sample galleries, etc.. That page still needs a little work, but is not bad!
For Nex Adapters I have a very basic guide (Click Here), but I would love to here what your interested in as far as this goes!! Their are so many adapters out their as well as lenses. It’s hard to dedicate time to the unknown if you know what I mean, but all the obvious adapters I will review.
Thanks again for your feedback and comments John.
Have a great day,
Jay
Hey Jay, do these conversion lenses attach to any of the other Sony e-mount lenses or just to the 16mm?
Hey Chris,
They are only designed to work on the 16mm wide angle lens.
Best,
Jay
Hi Jay,
I am a newbie.
Can you kindly advice me the difference between 16mm+WA vs 18mm-55mm lens?
Since both are wide angels, will there be any noticeable difference?
Thanks.
Hello Wei Yu,
The 16mm is a much smaller and lighter lens in relation to the 18-55mm. It’s also a prime lens meaning it’s only 16mm. The 18-55mm is a zoom lens and is much different in many ways. With a zoom lens you potentially have a lot more photography options at your finger tips. The 18-55mm kit lens also has OSS which the 16mm does not have. Overall the 16mm lens is a little sharper in my opinion and its also faster with a f/2.8 aperture.
Cost is also a little different as the 18-55mm is about $50 dollars more US than the 16mm.
At the wide end, 2mm is pretty noticeable, especially when you need it!! For regular “having fun photography” the 18-55mm is a very good all around kit lens in my opinion and the 18mm is wide enough for most stuff.
I hope that helps!!
Jay
Sony E-Mount 18-55mm f/3.5-4.5 OSS Lens – Compare Prices @ BHPhoto (Click Here) Amazon (Click Here) Adorama (Click Here)
Sony E-Mount 16mm f/2.8 Lens – Compare Prices @ BHPhoto (Click Here) Amazon (Click Here) Adorama (Click Here)
Thanks Jay. That clarifies most of my doubts!
Anytime!!
Jay
Thank you for the review Jay.
I do have a few questions for you.
I have bought both the 16 mm and the conversion lens.
Would it be best to use the 16mm with or without the conversion?
I’m about to leave for a vacation. When taking portrait photos of people, is it best to use the 16mm alone or with the conversion lens attached?
Thank you so much.
JC,
Thanks for the comments
The Conversion lenses simple give you more options than what the standard 16mm offers. The wide angle conversion for example will give you a slightly wider view. The fisheye will deliver a fisheye view.
As far as if it would be better for photographing people is not really relevant? It’s simple a different focal length at the wide end, or a heavily distorted fisheye effect. These can be used for portraits, but they tend to be more creative Landscape style portraits where the people are small in the frame, or a grand scene like a stadium or something. For actual “portraits” I tend to not use wide angles as they distort heavily at close range. I would go for the 18-55mm kit lens if you have it and try zooming in to about 35-55mm area. That will produce a little separation with the background if your close to the person, and result in a nicer “portrait”.
The conversion lenses are general used for Landscapes, and architecture type photography more than anything JC. That doesn’t mean you can’t get some cool wide angle or fishyeye portraits though
Hey; first off, let me tell you I’ve read nearly everything you’ve post in regards to the Nex line-up and all the E-mount lenses. And as I have none of anything at my disposal, I want to make sure I’m making the right choices. First offs I definitely want a fisheye, and I know how soft and “unliked” the Sony 16mm is. I really want the Sigma 19mm, but having both lenses seems redundant. Do you know if the Sigma has a conversion fisheye lens or if the Sony conversion lens will fit on the Sigma 19mm? Otherwise I already have an idea of the other lenses I’m purchasing.
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the kind words and questions
The 16mm is a great lens for the money. It is a little soft in the corners, but it’s really not that bad in my opinion. The Sigma 19mm is sharper in the corners for sure though. The Sony fisheye conversion adapter will only work on the Sony 16mm lens. The Rokinon 8mm f/2.8 fisheye lens I just reviewed Here >> is fantastic though!! It’s also not redundant to the 19mm lens.
Just so you know, I’m getting the 18-55mm kit lens and the 16mm pancake lens next week from a SonyAlphaLab reader!! I will have tons of sample photos with corner sharpness tests using the Nex-6. My current 16mm review is not near as extensive as my current reviews, so I plan on updating it with new photos and more tests ect.. Same with the 18-55mm kit lens. Perhaps you can wait a few weeks and see what results I get?
I hope this helps Chris,
Jay
Hi Jay, Thank you for taking time out to review all these great lenses and NEX cameras. Your website really helped me choose which NEX to pick. I’m new to the interchangeable lenses and the NEX system – I decided to go for the NEX6 with the 1650 lens. I really like the Fish eye and Wide angle converters but don’t know if its a good idea to buy the 16f28 lens just so I can get these effects? (it’d cost approx $500 for the lot). What do you suggest? I would mainly use the camera for traveling and perhaps shots of me and my friends. Could you please help me (there are too many lenses to choose from). Any help would be extremely appreciated
Thanks in advance!
Hello Nausheen,
That is a great question and a hard decision to make. I personally would go the 16mm and conversion lenses over the 16-50mm power zoom. For $500 you get three f/2.8 lenses!! A pretty great deal if you think about it. However, if you don’t need a wider lens than 16mm perhaps the SELP1650 would be be the better option for you as you suggested. You could then consider getting a dedicated Fisheye lens if you wanted down the road, like the killer Rokinon 8mm f/2.8 fisheye lens I recently reviewed (Click Here)
If your considering portraits of your friends and stuff, forget about the 16mm wide angle and go for the 50mm f/1.8 OSS lens or the 55-210mm OSS lens!! The SEL50f18 is great and will allow you to get killer separation between your subject and background. The 55-210mm is also great, but not near as fast as the 50mm f/1.8 Aperture. So Higher ISO will be needed for the same type of shots, but the extra zoom you gain is great for doing head shots and quickly zooming out to a full body shot for example. Primes you will need to physically move to zoom in and out. Can get hard with portraits, especially candid s’!! I like to keep my distance and stealth shoot in those party or reception type situations, as people are more relaxed and the photos tend to come out better.
I’m not the biggest fan of the 16-50mm power zoom lens as it’s distortion at 16mm is pretty extreme. Not the biggest deal if your shooting Jpeg, but Raw it’s really noticeable. Easily fixable in post processing software like Lightroom though. I got rid of mine and have the 18-55mm kit lens now, as I like it much better personally
I hope some of this helps, and feel free to ask more questions if you have them!
Jay
Thanks for your quick reply and suggestions, Jay!
The 1650 is part of the kit, so included with the NEX6. That’s why I was a bit confused whether it would make sense to spend the extra $500 for the 16F28 and converters considering there was already a 16mm lens included.
There’s also a kit that includes the 1650 + 55210 for an extra $300. Is that worth the extra money? Having so many lenses to choose from is a bit overwhelming when you’re not 100% sure what they do, or what you would end up using more down the road when you get more used to the system. The SEL18200LE is priced at $570 here, whereas the 55210 would cost me $400 (if bought separately to the kit) – out of the two, what would you recommend for still shots? I will get the 50F18 that you recommend – but I’m travelling to Poland first week of Feb and for now would really like something that will allow me to take quality pictures of scenery, landscape etc. esp. since I will be visiting Auschwitz while I am there.
What do you recommend?
Also, is it best to shoot Raw + Jpeg, does Raw take a lot of space?
Best,
N
Sorry for bombarding you with questions. Alternatively, buy the NEX6 alone without the 1650 for $1012 (converted from Danish Kroner) – with the 1650 its $1205.
The NEX6 kit with 1650 + 55210 would be $1511 but currently out of stock.
So unless it comes into stock by tomorrow (wont be able to wait for it, as i’m travelling 1st week of feb).
What lens combo do you suggest? (If I go with the 16mm pancake + UWA + FishEye converters – what should be a 2nd lens?) Hope to hear back soon
Hello,
No worries about the questions
I would go with the 16-50mm kit with the 55-210mm if it’s in stock. If you go with the other kit, I would suggest the 18-55mm kit lens or the 55-210mm lens. If you want better quality, go for one of the prime lenses. But then you will only have prime lenses for your trip?
Which store are you shopping at??
Thanks,
Jay
Hey again, I’m shopping on the Sony website for Denmark, they offer a 10% student/staff discount which is decent.
http://www.sony.dk/hub/nex-kompaktkameraer/udvalg/nex-6
There’s only 3 options:
1) NEX 6 – Body only – $1012
2) NEX 6 + SEL1650 – $1205
3) NEX 6 + SEL1650 + SEL55210 – $1511 (Out of Stock).
If I’m unable to get option 3, what would be a good combo? Is it worth buying the SEL55210 separately ($400) or getting the SEL18200LE ($570) instead? Or skip the zoom lens and as you suggest get the 50F18? But I’m guessing one should always have a zoom lens?
If I get option 2 – is it still worth getting the 16F28 with the converters?
I found two old canon lenses that used to belong to my grandpa, FL 200mm f4.5 and a FL 58mm f1.2 – would these be decent on the NEX6 with converters?
Hello again,
That is a tuff call. I would go with the 55-210mm to complement the 16-50mm lens. that will give you all the range you need for any type of photography on your trip. The Canon lenses are awesome and they will work great with adapters, but you will need to manually focus!! Here is the same adapter I have for my Minolta lens, except it’s the Canon FD/ FL version!! RainbowImagining Canon FL/FD to Sony NEx E-Mount
I hope that helps,
Jay
Thanks a lot Jay, I really appreciate you taking time out to help!
I will go for the 55210 – I read that it has a sharper result in comparison to the 18200LE.
What is the difference between the two?
No Problem Nausheen,
Yes, the 55-210mm is sharper than the 18-200m. The 55-210mm is designed to complement the Kit lens and pick up where it leaves off. The 18-200mm is a All in One lens, so it’s not going to be as good due to all the extra glass and other parts in the lens. Also the optics them selves are different in quality, groups, and arrangement inside the lens. Here’s my review of the 55-210mm (Click Here) and the 18-200mm (click Here) if you missed it
Happy Shopping!!
Jay
Everythings been ordered. Thanks again for all your help. I have 2 more questions!
Will the 20mm pancake be compatible with the converters?
Do I need to invest in filters? If so, what is best?
Nausheen,
Awesome, and anytime!!
No, the converters only work on the 16mm E-Mount lens
Not necessary, but they do offer some advantages in certain conditions!! A ND filter will allow you get slower shutter speeds in brighter conditions and a Polarizer will help cut down on glare and haze in certain conditions. Beyond that you have color filters and some other specialty stuff. More detailed info on Filters in the Lens Filters Guide >>
Jay
Dear Jay,
I have a Nex-6 and am a serious-enthusiast, though not aiming for professional photographing.
For some interested in having fisheye AND ultra-wide lenses, but who doesn’t own the SEL16F28 lens, which package is it better to purchase, the SEL16F28 with the 2 conversion lenses or the Rokinon 8mm?
Thanks a lot!
Fernando that is an excellent question. If you already have the 16-50mm lens you really don’t need the 16mm prime, as it’s redundant. Although the overall value with the conversion lenses factored in is awesome in my opinion.
The Rokinon Fisheye is more of a specialty lens, because it’s only a fisheye, and higher quality all around. It’s also fully manual which you may or may not like. The Rokinon optics are far superior to the 16mm w/ fisheye conversion lens. Especially in the corners. The build quality of the Rokinon is also much more rugged and is actually pretty heavy when you hold it. Rokinon 8mm Review Here >>
Personally I would go for the Rokinon, but with no autofocus, and it only being a fisheye makes it one of those lenses that sits in the bag more often than not. However, you can get some extraordinary frames with it as you learn to use it. Fisheye lenses are awesome, but not for everybody. My wife Michele doesn’t really care for the distortion it produces, but I sure do
I hope that helps!
Jay
Thanks, Jay! It really helps me.
One other question, I’m pretty inclined to buy the Zeiss lens (SEL14f28z). However, i’m also looking for an ultra wide lens and think the SEL1018 could be a great combo with the Zeisss lens. What’s your opinion? Does the SEL1018 really offer much different results than the Zeiss lens to justify paying ita high price tag?
Thanks again for your help.
No problem Fernando
I have not used the new zeiss lens obviously, but based on the 24mm quality the new ziess prime should be significantly better than the sel1018 zoom lens. Although the zoom lens is quite good, it will not compare to Zeiss prime lens.
I think it would make a killer complement if you can afford it. You can’t beat the optical quality of a well made prime. They look almost magical in comparison to a zoom lens at times in right conditions. It would be great to have the sel1018 for most wide angle work, but if the focal length was good and you wanted to get the best quality possible, break out the Zeiss 12mm prime!! Most likely it will deliver razer sharp corner to corner performance, and have killer contrast do to Zeiss lens coatings ect.. Plus if you need a low light wide angle, f/2.8 is pretty fast compared to f/4.
My guess is that new ziess E-Mount 12mm f/2.8 lens will be large in size!! Did you hear about it on SAR? I must have missed the rumor.
Thanks,
Jay
Thanks again, Jay! ALways very helpful. True, I saw the rumour on the upcoming 12mm from Zeiss. Supposedly they will also have a 32mm Zeiss coming this year too.
Maybe then a better combo would be the Zeiss 12mm with the 32mm, instead of the 24mm.
I would rather have the 32mm than the 24mm on the crop factor camera’s. Full frame is another story
Both Zeiss primes would be the way to go for the best optical quality over any of the zoom lenses. Zeiss is also coming out with a Zoom I heard??
Jay
By the way, I already own the 1650 and the 55210 lenses.
Hi, I want to ask if the VCL-ECU1 converter can be fit onto SELP1650 lens?
From the sony website and most forums, it did say VCL-ECU1 can fit onto SEL16F28 but did not mention anything about SELP1650 lens. Any advise what wide angle lens to buy? My existing is Nex5R with SELP1650 lens.. Thanks
Hello Es,
No it does not fit on the SELP1650 lens. The conversion lenses are only compatible with the sel16f28 lens which is a very specific lens design.
The new SEL1018 E-Mount lens is quite good and I’m reving it now with the nex-5r!! I a have a few sample pics up in the Nex-5r Review (Click Here)
The Sigma 19mm Prime lens is also a killer value for the dollar!!
I hope that helps,
Jay