Woop, just stumbled across LonelySpeck, which has solved basically all my astrophotography questions that I have and that I didn't know I have. Now looking at a Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 for the stars and...
Type: Posts; User: Jonasori
Woop, just stumbled across LonelySpeck, which has solved basically all my astrophotography questions that I have and that I didn't know I have. Now looking at a Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 for the stars and...
Thanks guys! Really helpful information. I would really like to have a full zoom range - much better for sports and such in my experience that way. That 18-105 looks to be just about what I need.
...
Hi all,
I have got to get rid of this 16-50 kit lens. I've been spoiled by the mindblowing greatness of the 70-200 f/4, but last night I was out trying to shoot the stars and got quite frustrated...
Panza: Haha my apologies for the perhaps rather direct comments on your lens. That lens and I had something of a falling out, but despite all my harsh words about it, it will always hold a tender...
Hey guys! So sorry for falling off the face of the earth. An update is in order.
I have completely switched; the last piece of my transition (my new bag) is arriving in the mail today. I ended up,...
True. And the Sony version (with an A to E adapter) would also presumably retain AF as well
Wow wow wow, thank you all so much. This is wonderful.
Yup, the 70-200 was on top of my list for lenses, but its great to hear such good things about the Sony. That'll be the one, I guess. I find,...
Hey, thanks for the quick replies.
I think my desire to switch is two-fold: first off, the features seem to just blow my Nikon's out of the water. The high frame rate and incredible AF really...
Hey all!
This is my first post here, but I've been reading up on the forum and it looks like there are some really knowledgeable people here.
As the title suggests, I am on the brink of...